Recombinant virus products and methods for inducing dux4 exon skipping

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to methods for shifting the splicing profile of the DUX4 gene, a double homeobox gene on human chromosome 4q35. Recombinant adeno-associated viruses of the invention deliver DNAs encoding U7-based small nucle-ar RNAs to induce DUX4 exon- skipping and the expression of shortened forms of DUX4. The methods have application in the treatment of muscular dystrophies such as facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 16/079,426, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 11,180,755,which is the U.S. national stage application of InternationalApplication No. PCT/US2017/019422, filed Feb. 24, 2017, which claims thebenefit of prior U.S. provisional application No. 62/300,500, filed Feb.26, 2016, the disclosures of which are each incorporated herein byreference in their entireties.

FIELD

The present invention relates to methods for shifting the splicingprofile of the DUX4 gene, a double homeobox gene on human chromosome4q35. Recombinant adeno-associated viruses of the invention deliver DNAsencoding U7-based small nuclear RNAs to induce DUX4 exon-skipping andthe expression of shortened forms of DUX4. The methods have applicationin the treatment of muscular dystrophies such as facioscapulohumeralmuscular dystrophy.

Incorporation by Reference of Materials Submitted Electronically

This application contains, as a separate part of disclosure, a SequenceListing in computer-readable form (filename: 50392A_Seqlisting.TXT;7,094 bytes—ASCII text file) which is incorporated by reference hereinin its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Muscular dystrophies (MDs) are a group of genetic diseases. The group ischaracterized by progressive weakness and degeneration of the skeletalmuscles that control movement. Some forms of MD develop in infancy orchildhood, while others may not appear until middle age or later. Thedisorders differ in terms of the distribution and extent of muscleweakness (some forms of MD also affect cardiac muscle), the age ofonset, the rate of progression, and the pattern of inheritance.

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a complex autosomaldominant disorder characterized by progressive and asymmetric weaknessof facial, shoulder and limb muscles. Symptoms typically arise inadulthood with most patients showing clinical features before agethirty. About five percent of patients develop symptoms as infants orjuveniles and these are generally more severely affected. Clinicalpresentation can vary from mild (some limited muscle weakness) to severe(wheelchair dependence). Historically, FSHD was classified as the thirdmost common MD, affecting one in 20,000 individuals worldwide. However,recent data indicate FSHD is the most common MD in Europe, suggestingits worldwide incidence may be underestimated.

Typical FSHD cases (FSHD1A, heretofore referred to as FSHD) are linkedto heterozygous chromosomal deletions that decrease the copy number of3.3 kilobase (kb) D4Z4 repeats on human chromosome 4q35. Simplistically,normal individuals have 11-100 tandemly-repeated D4Z4 copies on both4q35 alleles, while patients with FSHD have one normal and onecontracted allele containing 1-10 repeats. In addition FSHD-associatedD4Z4 contractions must occur on specific disease-permissive chromosome4q35 backgrounds (called 4qA). Importantly, no genes are completely lostor structurally mutated as a result of FSHD-associated deletions.Instead, genetic changes associated with FSHD give rise to expression ofthe toxic DUX4 gene, which is damaging to muscle. FSHD2 (also known asFSHD1B) is phenotypically identical to FSHD1, is associated with DUX4expression, and requires the 4qA chromosomal background. FSHD2 is notassociated with D4Z4 repeat contraction, but is instead caused bymutation in the SMCHD1 gene, which is a chromatin regulator normallyinvolved in repressing the DUX4 locus at 4qA. Mutated SMCHD1 proteinsfail to participate in adding heterochromatin to the 4qA DUX4 allele,thereby allowing DUX4 gene expression.

In the leading FSHD pathogenesis models, D4Z4 contractions are proposedto cause epigenetic changes that permit expression of the DUX4 gene. Asa result, the aberrant over-expression of otherwise silent ornear-silent DUX4 gene, and the genes it regulates, may ultimately causeFSHD. This model is consistent with data showing normal 4q35 D4Z4repeats have heterochromatin characteristics, while FSHD-linked D4Z4repeats contain marks more indicative of actively transcribedeuchromatin. These transcription-permissive epigenetic changes, coupledwith the observation that complete monosomic D4Z4 deletions (i.e., zerorepeats) do not cause FSHD, support the hypothesis that D4Z4 repeatsharbor potentially myopathic open reading frames (ORFs), which areabnormally expressed in FSHD muscles. This notion was initiallyconsidered in 1994, when a D4Z4-localized ORF, called DUX4, was firstidentified. However, the locus had some characteristics of anunexpressed pseudogene and DUX4 was therefore summarily dismissed as anFSHD candidate. For many years thereafter, the search for FSHD-relatedgenes was mainly focused outside the D4Z4 repeats, and although someintriguing candidates emerged from these studies, no single gene hasbeen conclusively linked to FSHD development. This slow progress led tothe re-emergence of DUX4 as an FSHD candidate in 2007. Even as of 2010though, researchers continued to highlight other genes as candidates.See, for example, Wuebbles et al., Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol., 3(4):386-400 (2010) highlighting the FSHD region gene 1 (frg1). In contrast,Wallace et al., Mol. Ther., 17(Suppl. 1): 5151 (2009); Wei et al., Mol.Ther., 17(Suppl. 1): 5200 (2009); and the Lemmers et al. report from theSciencexpress issue of Aug. 19, 2010 highlight DUX4. Neguembor andGabellini, Epigenomics, 2(2): 271-287 (2010) is a recent review articleregarding FSHD.

The role of DUX4 in FSHD pathogenesis can be explained as follows.First, D4Z4 with identical coding regions, and D4Z4 repeats also harborsmaller sense and antisense transcripts, including some resemblingmicroRNAs. Over-expressed DUX4 transcripts and a ˜50 kDa full-lengthDUX4 protein are found in biopsies and cell lines from FSHD patients.These data are consistent with a transcriptional de-repression model ofFSHD pathogenesis. In addition, unlike pseudogenes, D4Z4 repeats andDUX4 likely have functional importance, since tandemly-arrayed D4Z4repeats are conserved in at least eleven different placental mammalianspecies (non-placental animals lack D4Z4 repeats), with the greatestsequence conservation occurring within the DUX4 ORF. Second,over-expressed DUX4 is toxic to tissue culture cells and embryonicprogenitors of developing lower organisms in vivo. This toxicity occursat least partly through a pro-apoptotic mechanism, indicated byCaspase-3 activation in DUX4 transfected cells, and presence ofTUNEL-positive nuclei in developmentally arrested Xenopus embryosinjected with DUX4 mRNA at the two-cell stage. These findings areconsistent with studies showing some pro-apoptotic proteins, includingCaspase-3, are present in FSHD patient muscles. In addition tostimulating apoptosis, DUX4 may negatively regulate myogenesis. HumanDUX4 inhibits differentiation of mouse C2C12 myoblasts in vitro,potentially by interfering with PAX3 and/or PAX7, and causesdevelopmental arrest and reduced staining of some muscle markers whendelivered to progenitor cells of zebrafish or Xenopus embryos. Finally,aberrant DUX4 function is directly associated with potentially importantmolecular changes seen in FSHD patient muscles. Specifically,full-length human DUX4 encodes an approximately 50 kDa doublehomeodomain transcription factor, and its only known target, Pitxl, waselevated in DUX4 over-expressing FSHD patient muscles. These datasupport that DUX4 catalyzes numerous downstream molecular changes thatare incompatible with maintaining normal muscle integrity.

Splicing modulation using antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) has beendeveloped for the past two decades as a potential treatment for manydiseases, most notably Duchene muscular dystrophy (DMD). This includespre-clinical and clinical trials (Wein et al., Nat. Med., 20:992-1000(2014) and Mendell et al., Ann. Neurol.,74:637-47 (2013). DMD seemswell-suited to this type of treatment, since the disease is associatedwith porous muscle membranes that help permit AON penetration intomyofibers. There are no membrane defects in FSHD, and efficient AONdelivery may be difficult to achieve. Thus, like any nucleotide-basedtreatment, delivery of the therapeutic is a major barrier. It iscontemplated herein that AAV-based U7-snRNA gene therapy approaches helpcircumvent these potential delivery problems. The U7-snRNA is normallyinvolved in histone pre-mRNA 3′ end processing but it has been modifiedfor exon-skipping. There are three major features to the U7-snRNAsystem: (1) the U7 promoter to drive expression of the modified snRNA intarget cells; (2) an AON inserted in the snRNA backbone, which isdesigned to base-pair with splice junctions, branch points, or splicingenhancers; (3) a modified sequence (called smOPT) which recruitsrepressive ribonucleoproteins to the target pre-mRNA and preventssplicing [Schumperli et al., Cell. and Mol. Life Sciences, 61:2560-2570(2004)]. Finally, it is noteworthy that AONs and U7-snRNAs, have provensafe for use in vivo in large animal models of muscular dystrophy[LeGuiner et al., Mol. Ther., 22:1923-1935 (2014)].

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a replication-deficient parvovirus, thesingle-stranded DNA genome of which is about 4.7 kb in length includingtwo 145 nucleotide inverted terminal repeat (ITRs). There are multipleserotypes of AAV. The nucleotide sequences of the genomes of the AAVserotypes are known. For example, the complete genome of AAV-1 isprovided in GenBank Accession No. NC_002077; the complete genome ofAAV-2 is provided in GenBank Accession No. NC_001401 and Srivastava etal., J. Virol., 45: 555-564 (1983); the complete genome of AAV-3 isprovided in GenBank Accession No. NC_1829; the complete genome of AAV-4is provided in GenBank Accession No. NC_001829; the AAV-5 genome isprovided in GenBank Accession No. AF085716; the complete genome of AAV-6is provided in GenBank Accession No. NC_00 1862; at least portions ofAAV-7 and AAV-8 genomes are provided in GenBank Accession Nos. AX753246and AX753249, respectively; the AAVrh74 genome; the AAV-9 genome isprovided in Gao et al., J. Virol., 78: 6381-6388 (2004); the AAV-10genome is provided in Mol. Ther., 13(1): 67-76 (2006); the AAV-11 genomeis provided in Virology, 330(2): 375-383 (2004); the genome of AAV-12 isprovided in GenBank Accession No. DQ813647.1; and the genome of AAV-13is provided in GenBank Accession No. EU285562.1. Cis-acting sequencesdirecting viral DNA replication (rep), encapsidation/packaging and hostcell chromosome integration are contained within the AAV ITRs. Three AAVpromoters (named p5, p19, and p40 for their relative map locations)drive the expression of the two AAV internal open reading framesencoding rep and cap genes. The two rep promoters (p5 and p19), coupledwith the differential splicing of the single AAV intron (at nucleotides2107 and 2227), result in the production of four rep proteins (rep 78,rep 68, rep 52, and rep 40) from the rep gene. Rep proteins possessmultiple enzymatic properties that are ultimately responsible forreplicating the viral genome. The cap gene is expressed from the p40promoter and it encodes the three capsid proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3.Alternative splicing and non-consensus translational start sites areresponsible for the production of the three related capsid proteins. Asingle consensus polyadenylation site is located at map position 95 ofthe AAV genome. The life cycle and genetics of AAV are reviewed inMuzyczka, Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 158: 97-129(1992).

AAV possesses unique features that make it attractive as a vector fordelivering foreign DNA to cells, for example, in gene therapy. AAVinfection of cells in culture is noncytopathic, and natural infection ofhumans and other animals is silent and asymptomatic. Moreover, AAVinfects many mammalian cells allowing the possibility of targeting manydifferent tissues in vivo. Moreover, AAV transduces slowly dividing andnon-dividing cells, and can persist essentially for the lifetime ofthose cells as a transcriptionally active nuclear episome(extrachromosomal element). The AAV proviral genome is inserted ascloned DNA in plasmids which makes construction of recombinant genomesfeasible. Furthermore, because the signals directing AAV replication andgenome encapsidation are contained within the ITRs of the AAV genome,some or all of the internal approximately 4.3 kb of the genome (encodingreplication and structural capsid proteins, rep-cap) may be replacedwith foreign DNA. To generate AAV vectors, the rep and cap proteins maybe provided in trans. Another significant feature of AAV is that it isan extremely stable and hearty virus. It easily withstands theconditions used to inactivate adenovirus (56° to 65° C. for severalhours), making cold preservation of AAV less critical. AAV may even belyophilized. Finally, AAV-infected cells are not resistant tosuperinfection.

There remains a need in the art for a treatment for muscular dystrophiesincluding FSHD.

SUMMARY

The present invention provides methods and products for preventing orreducing the expression of full-length, toxic DUX4 protein. The methodsinvolve delivering U7-based small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) specific for theDUX4 gene to cells such as muscle cells. The DUX4 U7-based snRNAs arecapable of inducing the expression of non-toxic short isoforms of DUX4in a cell, e.g., by inducing exon skipping. Use of the methods andproducts is indicated, for example, in preventing or treating FSHD. Someembodiments of the invention exploit the unique properties of AAV todeliver DNA encoding DUX4 U7-based snRNAs to muscle cells. Otherembodiments of the invention utilize other vectors (for example, otherviral vectors such as adenovirus, retrovirus, lentivirus,equine-associated virus, alphavirus, pox viruses, herpes virus, poliovirus, sindbis virus and vaccinia viruses) to deliver polynucleotidesencoding DUX4 U7-based snRNAs.

In one aspect, the invention provides DUX4 U7-based snRNAs capable ofinducing the expression of a non-toxic DUX4 short isoform in a cell. Inanother aspect, the invention provides polynucleotides encoding one ormore DUX4 U7-based snRNAs. In another aspect, the invention providesrAAV encoding one or more DUX4 U7-based snRNAs wherein the rAAV lack repand cap genes. In some embodiments, the DUX4 U7-based snRNA is encodedby the DNA construct hU7-EX1-AS1 (SEQ ID NO: 1) or the DNA constructhU7-EX1-SD (SEQ ID NO: 2).

In another aspect, the invention provides a composition comprising arAAV encoding one or more DUX4 U7-based snRNAs (for example, a rAAVcomprising the DNA set out in SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2) wherein the rAAV lacksrep and cap genes.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of modifying thesplicing of the DUX4 gene in a cell comprising contacting the cell witha rAAV encoding one or more DUX4 U7-based snRNAs (for example, a rAAVcomprising the DNA set out in SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2) wherein the rAAV lacksrep and cap genes. DUX4 splicing may be modified by at least 10, 20, 30,40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95 or 99 percent.

In still another aspect, the invention provides a method of deliveringDNA encoding one or more DUX4 U7-based snRNAs to a subject in needthereof, comprising administering to the subject a rAAV encoding one ormore DUX4 U7-based snRNAs (for example, a rAAV comprising the DNA setout in SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2) wherein the rAAV lacks rep and cap genes.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of preventing ortreating a muscular dystrophy (including, but not limited to, FSHD)comprising administering a rAAV encoding one or ore DUX4 U7-based snRNAs(for example, a rAAV comprising the DNA set out in SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2)wherein the rAAV lacks rep and cap genes. “Treating” includesameliorating one or more symptoms of the muscular dystrophy (such asFSHD). Molecular, biochemical, histological and functional endpointsdemonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of DUX4 U7-based snRNAs. Treatmentendpoints contemplated by the invention include, but are not limited to,one or more of: the reduction or elimination of full length DUX4 proteinin affected muscles, increase in myofiber diameters, and improvement inmuscle strength.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Recombinant AAV genomes of the invention comprise one or more AAV ITRsflanking a polynucleotide encoding, for example, one or more DUX4U7-based snRNAs (i.e., an snRNA that binds to a DUX4 gene sequence andis expressed from a U7 snRNA). The polynucleotide is operatively linkedto transcriptional control DNA, specifically promoter DNA that isfunctional in target cells.

The rAAV genomes of the invention lack AAV rep and cap DNA. AAV DNA inthe rAAV genomes may be from any AAV serotype for which a recombinantvirus can be derived including, but not limited to, AAV serotypes AAV-1,AAV-2, AAV-3, AAV-4, AAV-5, AAV-6, AAV-7, AAV-8, AAVrh74, AAV-9, AAV-10,AAV-11, AAV-12 and AAV-13. As noted in the Background section above, thenucleotide sequences of the genomes of various AAV serotypes are knownin the art.

DNA plasmids of the invention comprise rAAV genomes of the invention.The DNA plasmids are transferred to cells permissible for infection witha helper virus of AAV (e.g., adenovirus, El-deleted adenovirus orherpesvirus) for assembly of the rAAV genome into infectious viralparticles. Techniques to produce rAAV particles, in which an AAV genometo be packaged, rep and cap genes, and helper virus functions areprovided to a cell are standard in the art. Production of rAAV requiresthat the following components are present within a single cell (denotedherein as a packaging cell): a rAAV genome, AAV rep and cap genesseparate from (i.e., not in) the rAAV genome, and helper virusfunctions. The AAV rep and cap genes may be from any AAV serotype forwhich recombinant virus can be derived and may be from a different AAVserotype than the rAAV genome ITRs, including, but not limited to, AAVserotypes AAV-1, AAV-2, AAV-3, AAV-4, AAV-5, AAV-6, AAV-7, AAV-8,AAVrh74, AAV-9, AAV-10, AAV-11, AAV-12 and AAV-13. Production ofpseudotyped rAAV is disclosed in, for example, WO 01/83692. Other typesof rAAV variants, for example rAAV with capsid mutations, are alsocontemplated. See, for example, Marsic et al., Molecular Therapy,22(11): 1900-1909 (2014).

A method of generating a packaging cell is to create a cell line thatstably expresses all the necessary components for AAV particleproduction. For example, a plasmid (or multiple plasmids) comprising arAAV genome lacking AAV rep and cap genes, AAV rep and cap genesseparate from the rAAV genome, and a selectable marker, such as aneomycin resistance gene, are integrated into the genome of a cell. AAVgenomes have been introduced into bacterial plasmids by procedures suchas GC tailing (Samulski et al., 1982, Proc. Natl. Acad. S6. USA,79:2077-2081), addition of synthetic linkers containing restrictionendonuclease cleavage sites (Laughlin et al., 1983, Gene, 23:65-73) orby direct, blunt-end ligation (Senapathy & Carter, 1984, J. Biol. Chem.,259:4661-4666). The packaging cell line is then infected with a helpervirus such as adenovirus. The advantages of this method are that thecells are selectable and are suitable for large-scale production ofrAAV. Other examples of suitable methods employ adenovirus orbaculovirus rather than plasmids to introduce rAAV genomes and/or repand cap genes into packaging cells.

General principles of rAAV production are reviewed in, for example,Carter, 1992, Current Opinions in Biotechnology, 1533-539; and Muzyczka,1992, Curr. Topics in Microbial. and Immunol., 158:97-129). Variousapproaches are described in Ratschin et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:2072(1984); Hermonat et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:6466 (1984);Tratschin et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:3251 (1985); McLaughlin et al., J.Virol., 62:1963 (1988); and Lebkowski et al., 1988 Mol. Cell. Biol.,7:349 (1988). Samulski et al. (1989, J. Virol., 63:3822-3828); U.S. Pat.No. 5,173,414; WO 95/13365 and corresponding U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,776 ;WO 95/13392; WO 96/17947; PCT/U598/18600; WO 97/09441 (PCT/US96/14423);WO 97/08298 (PCT/US96/13872); WO 97/21825 (PCT/US96/20777); WO 97/06243(PCT/FR96/01064); WO 99/11764; Perrin et al. (1995) Vaccine13:1244-1250; Paul et al. (1993) Human Gene Therapy 4:609-615; Clark etal. (1996) Gene Therapy 3:1124-1132; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,786,211;5,871,982; and 6,258,595.

The invention thus provides packaging cells that produce infectiousrAAV. In one embodiment packaging cells may be stably transformed cancercells such as HeLa cells, 293 cells and PerC.6 cells (a cognate 293line). In another embodiment, packaging cells are cells that are nottransformed cancer cells, such as low passage 293 cells (human fetalkidney cells transformed with El of adenovirus), MRC-5 cells (humanfetal fibroblasts), WI-38 cells (human fetal fibroblasts), Vero cells(monkey kidney cells) and FRhL-2 cells (rhesus fetal lung cells).

Recombinant AAV (i.e., infectious encapsidated rAAV particles) of theinvention comprise a rAAV genome. Embodiments include, but are notlimited to, a rAAV including a genome encoding one or more DUX4 U7-basedsnRNAs, for example, a genome comprising the DNA set out in SEQ ID NO: 1or the DNA set out in SEQ ID NO: 2, or comprising both DNAs. The genomesof the rAAV lack AAV rep and cap DNA, that is, there is no AAV rep orcap DNA between the ITRs of the genomes.

The rAAV may be purified by methods standard in the art such as bycolumn chromatography or cesium chloride gradients. Methods forpurifying rAAV vectors from helper virus are known in the art andinclude methods disclosed in, for example, Clark et al., Hum. GeneTher., 10(6): 1031-1039 (1999); Schenpp and Clark, Methods Mol. Med., 69427-443 (2002); U.S. Pat. No. 6,566,118 and WO 98/09657.

In another embodiment, the invention contemplates compositionscomprising rAAV of the present invention. Compositions of the inventioncomprise rAAV in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The compositionsmay also comprise other ingredients such as diluents and adjuvants.Acceptable carriers, diluents and adjuvants are nontoxic to recipientsand are preferably inert at the dosages and concentrations employed, andinclude buffers such as phosphate, citrate, or other organic acids;antioxidants such as ascorbic acid; low molecular weight polypeptides;proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulins;hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; amino acids such asglycine, glutamine, asparagine, arginine or lysine; monosaccharides,disaccharides, and other carbohydrates including glucose, mannose, ordextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA; sugar alcohols such as mannitolor sorbitol; salt-forming counterions such as sodium; and/or nonionicsurfactants such as Tween, pluronics or polyethylene glycol (PEG).

Titers of rAAV to be administered in methods of the invention will varydepending, for example, on the particular rAAV, the mode ofadministration, the treatment goal, the individual, and the cell type(s)being targeted, and may be determined by methods standard in the art.Titers of rAAV may range from about 1×10⁶, about 1×10⁷, about 1×10⁸,about 1×10⁹, about 1×10¹⁰, about 1×10¹¹, about 1×10¹², about 1×10¹³ toabout 1×10¹⁴ or more DNase resistant particles (DRP) per ml. Dosages mayalso be expressed in units of viral genomes (vg).

Methods of transducing a target cell with rAAV, in vivo or in vitro, arecontemplated by the invention. The in vivo methods comprise the step ofadministering an effective dose, or effective multiple doses, of acomposition comprising a rAAV of the invention to a subject (including ahuman being) in need thereof. If the dose is administered prior todevelopment of a disorder/disease, the administration is prophylactic.If the dose is administered after the development of a disorder/disease,the administration is therapeutic. In embodiments of the invention, aneffective dose is a dose that alleviates (eliminates or reduces) atleast one symptom associated with the disorder/disease state beingtreated,that slows or prevents progression to a disorder/diseasestate,that slows or prevents progression of a disorder/disease state,that diminishes the extent of disease, that results in remission(partial or total) of disease, and/or that prolongs survival. An exampleof a disease contemplated for prevention or treatment with methods ofthe invention is FSHD.

Combination treatments/therapies are also contemplated by the invention.Combination as used herein includes both simultaneous treatment orsequential treatments. Combinations of methods of the invention withstandard medical treatments (e.g., corticosteroids) are specificallycontemplated, as are combinations with novel therapies. Combinationtherapy with therapies disclosed in International Publication No. WO2013/016352 are specifically contemplated. International Publication No.WO 2013/016352 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Administration of an effective dose of the compositions may be by routesstandard in the art including, but not limited to, intramuscular,parenteral, intravenous, oral, buccal, nasal, pulmonary, intracranial,intraosseous, intraocular, rectal, or vaginal. Route(s) ofadministration and serotype(s) of AAV components of the rAAV (inparticular, the AAV ITRs and capsid protein) of the invention may bechosen and/or matched by those skilled in the art taking into accountthe infection and/or disease state being treated and the targetcells/tissue(s) that are to express the DUX4 U7-based snRNAs.

In particular, actual administration of rAAV of the present inventionmay be accomplished by using any physical method that will transport therAAV recombinant vector into the target tissue of a subject.Administration according to the invention includes, but is not limitedto, injection into muscle, the bloodstream and/or directly into theliver. Simply resuspending a rAAV in phosphate buffered saline has beendemonstrated to be sufficient to provide a vehicle useful for muscletissue expression, and there are no known restrictions on the carriersor other components that can be co-administered with the rAAV (althoughcompositions that degrade DNA should be avoided in the normal mannerwith rAAV). Capsid proteins of a rAAV may be modified so that the rAAVis targeted to a particular target tissue of interest such as muscle.See, for example, WO 02/053703. Pharmaceutical compositions can beprepared as injectable formulations or as topical formulations to bedelivered to the muscles by transdermal transport. Numerous formulationsfor both intramuscular injection and transdermal transport have beenpreviously developed and can be used in the practice of the invention.The rAAV can be used with any pharmaceutically acceptable carrier forease of administration and handling.

For purposes of intramuscular injection, solutions in an adjuvant suchas sesame or peanut oil or in aqueous propylene glycol can be employed,as well as sterile aqueous solutions. Such aqueous solutions can bebuffered, if desired, and the liquid diluent first rendered isotonicwith saline or glucose. Solutions of rAAV as a free acid (DNA containsacidic phosphate groups) or a pharmacologically acceptable salt can beprepared in water suitably mixed with a surfactant such ashydroxpropylcellulose. A dispersion of rAAV can also be prepared inglycerol, liquid polyethylene glycols and mixtures thereof and in oils.Under ordinary conditions of storage and use, these preparations containa preservative to prevent the growth of microorganisms. In thisconnection, the sterile aqueous media employed are all readilyobtainable by standard techniques well-known to those skilled in theart.

The pharmaceutical forms suitable for injectable use include sterileaqueous solutions or dispersions and sterile powders for theextemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable solutions ordispersions. In all cases the form must be sterile and must be fluid tothe extent that easy syringability exists. It must be stable under theconditions of manufacture and storage and must be preserved against thecontaminating actions of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. Thecarrier can be a solvent or dispersion medium containing, for example,water, ethanol, polyol (for example, glycerol, propylene glycol, liquidpolyethylene glycol and the like), suitable mixtures thereof, andvegetable oils. The proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, bythe use of a coating such as lecithin, by the maintenance of therequired particle size in the case of a dispersion and by the use ofsurfactants. The prevention of the action of microorganisms can bebrought about by various antibacterial and antifungal agents, forexample, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol, sorbic acid, thimerosal andthe like. In many cases it will be preferable to include isotonicagents, for example, sugars or sodium chloride. Prolonged absorption ofthe injectable compositions can be brought about by use of agentsdelaying absorption, for example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin.

Sterile injectable solutions are prepared by incorporating rAAV in therequired amount in the appropriate solvent with various otheringredients enumerated above, as required, followed by filtersterilization. Generally, dispersions are prepared by incorporating thesterilized active ingredient into a sterile vehicle which contains thebasic dispersion medium and the required other ingredients from thoseenumerated above. In the case of sterile powders for the preparation ofsterile injectable solutions, the preferred methods of preparation arevacuum drying and the freeze drying technique that yield a powder of theactive ingredient plus any additional desired ingredient from thepreviously sterile-filtered solution thereof.

Transduction with rAAV may also be carried out in vitro. In oneembodiment, desired target muscle cells are removed from the subject,transduced with rAAV and reintroduced into the subject. Alternatively,syngeneic or xenogeneic muscle cells can be used where those cells willnot generate an inappropriate immune response in the subject.

Suitable methods for the transduction and reintroduction of transducedcells into a subject are known in the art. In one embodiment, cells canbe transduced in vitro by combining rAAV with muscle cells, e.g., inappropriate media, and screening for those cells harboring the DNA ofinterest using conventional techniques such as Southern blots and/orPCR, or by using selectable markers. Transduced cells can then beformulated into pharmaceutical compositions, and the compositionintroduced into the subject by various techniques, such as byintramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous and intraperitoneal injection,or by injection into smooth and cardiac muscle, using e.g., a catheter.

Transduction of cells with rAAV of the invention results in sustainedexpression of DUX4 U7-based snRNAs. The present invention thus providesmethods of administering/delivering rAAV which express DUX4 U7-basedsnRNAs to a subject, preferably a human being. These methods includetransducing tissues (including, but not limited to, tissues such asmuscle, organs such as liver and brain, and glands such as salivaryglands) with one or more rAAV of the present invention. Transduction maybe carried out with gene cassettes comprising tissue specific controlelements. For example, one embodiment of the invention provides methodsof transducing muscle cells and muscle tissues directed by musclespecific control elements, including, but not limited to, those derivedfrom the actin and myosin gene families, such as from the myoD genefamily [See Weintraub et al., Science, 251: 761-766 (1990], themyocyte-specific enhancer binding factor MEF-2 [Cserjesi and Olson, MolCell Biol 11: 4854-4862 (1990], control elements derived from the humanskeletal actin gene [Muscat et al., Mol Cell Biol, 7: 4089-4099 (1987)],the cardiac actin gene, muscle creatine kinase sequence elements [SeeJohnson et al., Mol Cell Biol, 9:3393-3399 (1989)] and the murinecreatine kinase enhancer (mCK) element, control elements derived fromthe skeletal fast-twitch troponin C gene, the slow-twitch cardiactroponin C gene and the slow-twitch troponin I gene: hypoxia-induciblenuclear factors [Semenza et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 88: 5680-5684(1990], steroid-inducible elements and promoters including theglucocorticoid response element (GRE) [See Mader and White, Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5603-5607 (1993)], and other control elements.

Muscle tissue is an attractive target for in vivo DNA delivery, becauseit is not a vital organ and is easy to access. The inventioncontemplates sustained expression of one or more U7-based snRNAs fromtransduced myofibers.

By “muscle cell” or “muscle tissue” is meant a cell or group of cellsderived from muscle of any kind (for example, skeletal muscle and smoothmuscle, e.g. from the digestive tract, urinary bladder, blood vessels orcardiac tissue). Such muscle cells may be differentiated orundifferentiated, such as myoblasts, myocytes, myotubes, cardiomyocytesand cardiomyoblasts.

The term “transduction” is used to refer to the administration/deliveryof one or more DUX4 U7-based snRNAs to a recipient cell either in vivoor in vitro, via a replication-deficient rAAV of the invention resultingin expression of the one or more DUX4 U7-based snRNA by the recipientcell.

Thus, the invention provides methods of administering an effective dose(or doses, administered essentially simultaneously or doses given atintervals) of rAAV that encode one or more DUX4 U7-based snRNAs to apatient in need thereof (e.g., an FSHD patient).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 shows the human DUX4 DNA sequence (SEQ ID NO: 5) in whichnucleotides 1-300 are the 5′ UTR; nucleotides 301-1575 are DUX4 openreading frame (protein coding); nucleotides 1-1582 are Exon 1;nucleotides 1540-1571 are the 779 sequence binding site; nucleotides1573-1607 are 778 sequence binding site; nucleotides1583-1718 are Intron1; nucleotides 1719-1811 are Exon 2; nucleotides 1812-2174 are Intron 2;and nucleotides 2175-2347are Exon 3 sequences ending at poly A site.

FIGS. 2A-2C show the DUX4 gene structure and U7 snRNA antisense bindinglocations. FIG. 2A) DUX4 locus in chromosome 4. FIG. 2B) DUX4transcripts arise from 3 exons (rectangles). DUX4 coding region isshown, where black boxes in exon 1 represent 2 DNA binding domains.Introns are represented by downward pointing lines, polyA signals areidentified. FIG. 2C) Structures of the U7 snRNAs and the relativelocation of each binding sequence in the DUX4-FL transcript shown in B).

FIGS. 3A-3B show the results of DUX4 cell death and expression assays.FIG. 2A) Full-length DUX4 (DUX4-FL) but not short forms of DUX4 (DUX4-s)caused apoptotic death of HEK293 cells in an Apo-ONE caspase-3/7 assaywhich measures caspase activity (fluorescent output). FIG. 2B) In anexperiment treating HEK293 cells with U7-based snRNA constructsdescribed herein, sequences 778 (hU7-EX1-SD) and 779 (hU7-EX1-AS1)reduced full-length DUX4 protein expression (western blot) and sequence779 (hU7-EX1-AS1) significantly protected HEK293s from death using acaspase-3/7 assay readout to measure apoptosis.

EXAMPLES

The role of DUX4 in FSHD pathogenesis can be explained as follows.First, D4Z4 repeats are not pseudogenes. The DUX4 locus produces 1.7 kband 2.0 kb full-length mRNAs with identical coding regions, and D4Z4repeats also harbor smaller sense and antisense transcripts, includingsome resembling microRNAs. Over-expressed DUX4 transcripts and a ˜50 kDafull-length DUX4 protein are found in biopsies and cell lines from FSHDpatients. These data are consistent with a transcriptional de-repressionmodel of FSHD pathogenesis. In addition, unlike pseudogenes, D4Z4repeats and DUX4 likely have functional importance, sincetandemly-arrayed D4Z4 repeats are conserved in at least eleven differentplacental mammalian species (non-placental animals lack D4Z4 repeats),with the greatest sequence conservation occurring within the DUX4 ORF.Second, over-expressed DUX4 is toxic to tissue culture cells andembryonic progenitors of developing lower organisms in vivo. Thistoxicity occurs at least partly through a pro-apoptotic mechanism,indicated by Caspase-3 activation in DUX4 transfected cells, andpresence of TUNEL-positive nuclei in developmentally arrested Xenopusembryos injected with DUX4 mRNA at the two-cell stage. These findingsare consistent with studies showing some pro-apoptotic proteins,including Caspase-3, are present in FSHD patient muscles. In addition tostimulating apoptosis, DUX4 may negatively regulate myogenesis. HumanDUX4 inhibits differentiation of mouse C2C12 myoblasts in vitro,potentially by interfering with PAX3 and/or PAX7, and causesdevelopmental arrest and reduced staining of some muscle markers whendelivered to progenitor cells of zebrafish or Xenopus embryos. Finally,aberrant DUX4 function is directly associated with potentially importantmolecular changes seen in FSHD patient muscles. Specifically,full-length human DUX4 encodes an approximately 50 kDa doublehomeodomain transcription factor, and its only known target, Pitxl, waselevated in DUX4 over-expressing FSHD patient muscles. These datasupport that DUX4 catalyzes numerous downstream molecular changes thatare incompatible with maintaining normal muscle integrity.

Transcriptional de-repression of FSHD is associated with increasedexpression of the toxic DUX4 transcription factor (the full length, longform), arising from the chromosome 4q subtelomere. This region isnormally embedded in heterochromatin and therefore suppressed.

The treatment methods contemplated herein shift the DUX4 splicingprofile to favor non-toxic DUX4 (short) forms. This is accomplished byusing an antisense exon-skipping strategy designed to block productionof toxic, full-length DUX4.

Exemplary aspects and embodiments of the invention are illustrated bythe following examples.

Example 1 U7-Based snRNA Constructs for DUX4 Exon Skipping

As noted above, FSHD is associated with increased expression of thetoxic DUX4 transcription factor from the chromosome 4q subtelomere. Thisregion is normally embedded in heterochromatin and therefore suppressed;in FSHD, deletion of chromatin seeding repetitive elements called D4Z4repeats (FSHD1; 95% of cases) or mutation in a chromatin modifier geneSMCHD1 (FSHD2; 5%) cause epigenetic changes that de-repress the 4qregion and trigger expression of the DUX4 transcription factor (FIGS. 2Aand B). Using DUX4 over-expression models, we found that full-lengthDUX4 (DUX4-FL) causes cell death in vitro and muscle damage in vivo,while a truncated, natural isoform of DUX4 (DUX4s) is non-toxic.

We then designed U7-based snRNAs to prevent splicing of full-lengthDUX4, or inhibit its polyadenylation (FIG. 2C). U7 snRNA is normallyinvolved in histone pre-mRNA 3′ end processing, but mutating the Sm/Lsmprotein binding site allows U7 snRNA to become a versatile splicingmodulation tool [Young et al., PLoS Genet 9(11):e1003947]. We generatedU7-based snRNAs designed to block splicing of the DUX4-FL isoform (bymasking splice enhancers, splice donors, or splice acceptors), orprevent polyadenylation and de-stabilize the transcript. The DUX4 geneis composed of three exons; the first encodes a full-length DUX4 ORF andthe other two are untranslated exons. Exon 3 contains a non-canonicalpolyA signal that is utilized only in FSHD-permissive muscles. The fulllength DUX4 ORF encodes a protein containing two DNA binding domains anda C-terminal transactivation domain. This full length protein is toxicto muscles and other tissues/cells. A second isoform has been reported[Snider et al., Plos Genetics, 6(10):e1001181 (2010], called DUX4-s(DUX4-short) which arises from the same exon 1 ORF, but this shorterversion utilizes an internal splice site which splices out theC-terminal transactivation domain. This shorter version is non-toxic.

We designed U7-based snRNAs to shift the DUX4 splicing profile to favorthe benign short form (DUX4s) over the toxic full-length (FL) form. TwoU7-based snRNAs were targeted to the splice donor and splice enhancersat the exon 1/intron 1 junction (sequences 778 and 779 below), whichwill induce DUX4-s production. Sequence 780 was designed to mask thepoly-A signal located in exon 3, which would destabilize the DUX4transcript. We also designed a U7-based snRNA 781 to serve as a negativecontrol. It targets the noncoding exon 3 splice acceptor site and istherefore not expected to affect DUX-FL splicing and toxicity. See FIG.2. To produce the U7-based snRNAs, we cloned antisense sequences intothe human U7 snRNA system used for dystrophin exon skipping [Goyenvalleet al, Science, 306(5702):1796-1799 (2004)].

DNAs encoding the U7-based snRNA constructs are set out below. In thesequences, the U7 promoter sequence is double-underlined, the antisensesequences targeting DUX4 are bolded, the SmOPT sequence (binding sitefor Hnrnpal) is underlined, the hairpin loop sequence from human U7snRNA is dotted, and the remaining sequence is the loop structure of U7transcript.

Sequence 779: hU7-EX1-AS1 (SEQ ID NO: 1) (bolded antisense sequence binds to nucleotides 1540-1571 of DUX4 SEQ ID NO: 5)5′TTTGCTAGCTACTGCCGAATCCAGGTCTCCGGGCTTAACAACAACGAAGGGGCTGTGACTGGCTGCTTTCTCAACCAATCAGCACCGAACTCATTTGCAGTTCCTTAGAATATTATTTTTCCTACTGAAAGTTACCACATGCGTCGTTAGTTCCTTAGAATATTATTTTTCCTACTGAAAGTTACCACATGCGTCGTTGTTTATACAGTAATAGGAACAAGAAAAAAGTCACCTAAGCTCACCCTCATCAATTGTGGAGTTCCTTTATATCCCATCTTCTCTCCAAACACATACGCAG

GATTGTTTTCACTGTGCAAAAATTATGGGTAGTTTTGGTGGTCTTGATGCAGTTGTAAGCTTGGGGACTAGTTT3′ Sequence 778: hU7-EX1-SD (SEQ ID NO: 2) (bolded antisense sequence binds tonucleotides 1573-1607 of DUX4 SEQ ID NO: 5)5′TTTGCTAGCTACTGCCGAATCCAGGTCTCCGGGCTTAACAACAACGAAGGGGCTGTGACTGGCTGCTTTCTCAACCAATCAGCACCGAACTCATTTGCATGGGCTGAGAACAAATGTTCGCGAACTCTAGAAATGAATGACTTAAGTAAGTTCCTTAGAATATTATTTTTCCTACTGAAAGTTACCACATGCGTCGTTGTTTATACAGTAATAGGAACAAGAAAAAAGTCACCTAAGCTCACCCTCATCAATTGTGGAGTTCCTTTATATCCCATCTTCTCTCCAAACACATACGCAG

ATAGATTGTTTTCACTGTGCAAAAATTATGGGTAGTTTTGGTGGTCTTGATGCAGTTGTAAGCTTGGGGACTAGTTT3′Sequence 781: hU7EX3-AS1 (SEQ ID NO: 3) (bolded antisense sequence binds to DUX4 SEQ ID NO:5, atop the DUX4 intron 2/exon 3 splice junction)5′TTTGCTAGCTACTGCCGAATCCAGGTCTCCGGGCTTAACAACAACGAAGGGGCTGTGACTGGCTGCTTTCTCAACCAATCAGCACCGAACTCATTTGCATGGGCTGAGAACAAATGTTCGCGAACTCTAGAAATGAATGACTTAAGTAAGTTCCTTAGAATATTATTTTTCCTACTGAAAGTTACCACATGCGTCGTTGTTTATACAGTAATAGGAACAAGAAAAAAGTCACCTAAGCTCACCCTCATCAATTGTGGAGTTCCTTTATATCCCATCTTCTCTCCAAACACATACGCAGGCACGTCAGCCGGGGTGCGCACTGCGCGCAGGTCTAGTCAGGA AATTTTT

TGCCAATGATAGATTGTTTTCACTGTGCAAAAATTATGGGTAGTTTTGGTGGTCTTGATGCAGTTGTAAGCTTGGGGACTAGTTT3′Sequence 780; hU7-pA-AS (SEQ ID NO: 4) (bolded antisense sequence binds toDUX4 SEQ ID NO: 5 atop the DUX4 polyA signal)5′TTTGCTAGCTACTGCCGAATCCAGGTCTCCGGGCTTAACAACAACGAAGGGGCTGTGACTGGCTGCTTTCTCAACCAATCAGCACCGAACTCATTTGCATGGGCTGAGAACAAATGTTCGCGAACTCTAGAAATGAATGACTTAAGTAAGTTCCTTAGAATATTATTTTTCCTACTGAAAGTTACCACATGCGTCGTTGTTTATACAGTAATAGGAACAAGAAAAAAGTCACCTAAGCTCACCCTCATCAATTGTGGAGTTCCTTTATATCCCATCTTCTCTCCAAACACATACGCAG

TTGTTTTCACTGTGCAAAAATTATGGGTAGTTTTGGTGGTCTTGATGCAGTTGTAAGCTTGGGGACTAGTTT3′

The constructs were each cloned into a pUC57 plasmid vector backbone.

Example 2 Treatment of Cells with U7-Based snRNA Constructs

The pUC57 plasmid vectors expressing DUX4 and the therapeutic U7-basedsnRNA constructs were then delivered to HEK293 cells usingLipfectamine-2000, either individually or in combinations, and severaloutcome measures were examined, including assessment of apoptotic celldeath, measurement of DUX4 full-length and DUX4-short gene expression,as well as DUX4-activated biomarkers.

Treatment of DUX4-expressing HEK293 cells with hU7-EX1-AS1 or hU7-EX1-SDreduced full-length DUX4 protein expression as measured by Lowry assay,while hU7-EX1-AS1 significantly protected HEK293 cells from apoptoticcell death, as measured by caspase-3/7 assay (FIG. 2B).

Example 3 Production of rAAV Comprising U7-Based snRNA Constructs

rAAV vector was produced by co-transfection in HEK293 cells of threeplasmids [pAdhelper, AAV helper, and a rAAV genome containing DUX4U7-based snRNA construct(s)], followed by cell-harvesting, vectorpurification, titration, and quality control assays.

Plasmids: pAdhelper contains the adenovirus genes E2A, E4 ORF6, and VAI/II; AAV helper plasmids contain AAV rep2 and cap6 (for example, for anAAV serotype 6 preparation, the capsid gene would be called cap6); therAAV plasmid contains AAV inverted terminal repeat (ITRs) sequencesflanking the U7-based snRNA constructs to be packaged into the vector.

Transfection: Plasmids were transfected into 293 cells (Corning10-Stack) using CaPO4 at a 4:4:1 ratio (20 ug pAd helper: 20 ug AAVhelper: 5 ug rAAV vector plasmid per plate.

Cell harvesting: Forty-eight hr post-transfection, cells were harvestedand resuspended in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM MgCl₂ and 150 mM NaCl(T20M1N150) at a density of 5×10⁶ cells/ml. Cells were lysed by foursequential freeze/thaw cycles and Benzonase nuclease (AIC, Stock: 250U/ul) added to a final concentration of 90 U/ml before cell lysateclarification.

Vector Purification and Titration: Clarified lysates were subjected toiodixanol step gradient purification as previously described (Xiao, X,et al. J. Virol 72:2224-32). The 40% iodixanol layer (containing rAAV)was diluted 5-fold with a no-salt dilution buffer (pH varying dependingon serotype) and applied to a Hi-Trap HP-Q/S column. Upon elution with aNaCl salt gradient, peak 1 ml fractions (typically 3-5) were pooled,dialyzed with T20M1N200 (pH 8.0), then sterile filtered and supplementedwith 0.001% Pluronic F68. Vector was stored at −80° C. Purified viruswas titered for vg using Q-PCR as previously described [Schnepp andClark, Methods Mol. Med., 69:427-443 (2002)].

Example 4

The effects of the U7-based snRNAs described herein are demonstrated inan FSHD animal model in which the DUX4 gene (coding region +twodownstream untranslated exons) is expressed in muscle usingadeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors. The FSHD model recapitulates toxicmuscle phenotypes that are useful as therapy outcome measures, including

Histopathology—rapid development of muscle lesions; presence of centralnuclei within 2 weeks, highly variable myofiber sizesMolecular/Biochemical—DUX4 expression; Caspase-3 expression 1,4;downstream biomarker expression (e.g., ZSCAN4)Functional—muscle strength deficits (e.g., grip strength, specificforce)

rAAV comprising one or more U7-based snRNA constructs described hereinare co-delivered to animals at 1:1 and 10:1 doses with AAV vectorsexpressing full-length DUX4 containing all three exons, using ourpreviously published methods [Wallace et al., Ann. Neurol., 69: 540-442(2011) and Mitsuhashi et al., Hum. Mol. Genet., 22: 568-577 (2012)]. At1, 2, and 4 weeks following intramuscular injection, outcomes (listedabove; initially with n=5 mice planned with additional injectionspossible) are assessed. The relative amount of DUX4 and DUX4-s is alsoassessed using real-time PCR approaches.

While the present invention has been described in terms of specificembodiments, it is understood that variations and modifications willoccur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, only such limitations asappear in the claims should be placed on the invention.

All documents referred to in this application are hereby incorporated byreference in their entirety.

1. A recombinant adeno-associated virus comprising one or more DUX4U7-based snRNA constructs construct(s), wherein each construct comprises(a) the nucleotide sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 3; (b) the nucleotidesequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 4; or (c) the nucleotide sequence set outin SEQ ID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO:
 4. 2. (canceled)
 3. A compositioncomprising the recombinant adeno-associated virus of claim
 1. 4-5.(Canceled)
 6. A method of delivering a DUX4 U7-based snRNA construct toa subject in need thereof, comprising administering to the subject aneffective dose of a recombinant adeno-associated virus comprising one ormore DUX4 U7-based snRNA constructs each construct comprising (a) thenucleotide sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 3; (b) the nucleotide sequenceset out in SEQ ID NO: 4; or (c) the nucleotide sequence set out in SEQID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO:
 4. 7-9. (canceled)
 10. A nucleic acid comprising(a) the nucleotide sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 3; (b) the nucleotidesequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 4; or (c) the nucleotide sequence set outin SEQ ID NO: 3 and SEQ ID NO:
 4. 11. (canceled)
 12. The recombinantadeno-associated virus of claim 1, wherein the virus lacks rep and capgenes.
 13. The recombinant adeno-associated virus of claim 1, whereinthe RNA encoded by the DUX4 U7-based snRNA construct is capable ofinducing the expression of a non-toxic DUX4 short isoform in a cell. 14.The recombinant adeno-associated virus of claim 1, wherein theadeno-associated virus is AAV1, AAV2, AAV3, AAV4, AAV5, AAV6, AAV7,AAV8, AAV9, AAV10, AAV11, AAV12, AAV13, or AAVrh74.
 15. The method ofclaim 6, wherein the virus lacks rep and cap genes.
 16. The method ofclaim 6, wherein the RNA encoded by the DUX4 U7-based snRNA construct iscapable of inducing the expression of a non-toxic DUX4 short isoform ina cell.
 17. The method of claim 6, wherein the adeno-associated virus isAAV1, AAV2, AAV3, AAV4, AAV5, AAV6, AAV7, AAV8, AAV9, AAV10, AAV11,AAV12, AAV13, or AAVrh74.
 18. The method of claim 6, wherein the dose isadministered intramuscularly, intravenously, subcutaneously, orintraperitoneally.